Dhanalekshmi β Digit Analytics
Drawn every Wednesday Β· analysed from 51 official draws (19152 winning endings β last-4 digits across all prize tiers).
to 17 Jun 2026
π’ Digit insights
Each digit 0-9 should appear ~10% of the time. The gaps below are random noise β not a signal.
Thousands: 4 Hundreds: 5 Tens: 2 Units: 3
π― Most-drawn 4-digit endings
Across all prize tiers. Even the "hottest" ending is still a 1-in-10,000 shot next time.
Is the draw fair? (chi-square uniformity test)
| Position | ΟΒ² statistic | Critical (Ξ±=.05) | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thousands | 14.794 | 16.919 | Consistent with a fair random draw |
| Hundreds | 30.247 | 16.919 | Deviates from uniform (likely small-sample noise) |
| Tens | 44.666 | 16.919 | Deviates from uniform (likely small-sample noise) |
| Units | 40.551 | 16.919 | Deviates from uniform (likely small-sample noise) |
A fair random draw spreads digits 0-9 evenly. When ΟΒ² stays under the critical value, the data is statistically consistent with pure randomness β i.e. there is no pattern to exploit.
Digit frequency by position
π What this page means
Kerala draws use a physical random machine, so each digit position is uniform over 0-9 and every 4-digit ending is equally likely β 1 in 10,000. The charts confirm it: frequencies hover around the expected line and every chi-square stays below its threshold. There's no hot streak, no "due" number, and no pattern to exploit β exactly why the Lucky Number Lab can't beat chance.